USPTO serial 74244328
COMBIPAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMBIPAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Georg Seka
J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDONE MARKET PLZSTEUART ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | packaging machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |