Drawing for FLAVORTECH

USPTO serial 74244384

FLAVORTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1997221Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 27, 1996
Examiner
—
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FLAVORTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul I. J. Fleischut

Paul I. J. Fleischut SENNIGER POWERS LLP100 North Broadway, 17th FloorSt. Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005material treatment, formulation or processing technique to tastemask and taste improve systems; namely, preparations or additives to render drug entities tasteless, and improve palatability, or enhance flavorSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 23, 1996
040[treatment of drug entities by application of current pharmaceutical formulation techniques in order to render drug entities tasteless, improve palatability or to enhance flavor]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 23, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 24, 2019C8.TCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)—
Oct 21, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 27, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 9, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 15, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 15, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 10, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 21, 2007PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jun 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 27, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 200789AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Feb 8, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 2, 20048.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED—
Feb 27, 20038.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 28, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 30, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance