USPTO serial 74244446
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
Ste. Genevieve, MO
Other trademarks owned by Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
Ste. Genevieve, MO
Other trademarks owned by Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
STE. GENEVIEVE, MO
Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
Ste. Genevieve, MO
Other trademarks owned by Linus C. Hoffmeister, Jr. and Mary H. Hoffmeister Partnership, The
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wine | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |