USPTO serial 74244616
SILITEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILITEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian Jay Kaufman
IAN JAY KAUFMAN LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical connectors, computer hardware, integrated circuits, computer keyboards, microcomputers, ceramic variable capacitors, light emitting diodes, electrical controllers, semiconductors, solar batteries, telephones, telecommunications interface boards, mouse and image scanner | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | rubber hoses and sheets for use in connection with computers | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | business management and marketing consulting services; market research and analysis | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | financial negotiations and investment advisory services for others in matters of buying and selling goods and services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |