Drawing for MARKET VALIDATION

USPTO serial 74244767

MARKET VALIDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARKET VALIDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Jaffer

DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM, PARISH & ISAACS160 W SANTA CLARA ST 15TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035consulting services in the field of product and market development and market researchACTIVEMay 15, 1984
041seminars and management training courses in the field of product and market development and market researchACTIVEMar 4, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 17, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 12, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 8, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 10, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 8, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 21, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance