Drawing for BACK RELIEF

USPTO serial 74245115

BACK RELIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACK RELIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin L. Stern

MARTIN L STERN LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010combination back support and heat massage deviceABANDONEDOct 1, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 16, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 7, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 18, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 3, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance