Drawing for ROSES-R-US

USPTO serial 74245398

ROSES-R-US

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSES-R-US?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

MARK D MILLER KIMBLE, MACMICHAEL & UPTON5260 N PALM, STE 221FRESNO, CA 93704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031cut flowers and greenery for use in floral bouquetsABANDONEDNov 28, 1991
039storage and transportation of cut flowers and greenery for floral bouquets; overnight by air, and locally by truckABANDONEDNov 28, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 15, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 30, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance