USPTO serial 74245458
CASTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Double Bay, New South Wales, AU
New York, NY
Piper Point, New South Wales, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy H. Cascio
AMY H CASCIO RICHARDS & O'NEIL885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4873UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | equipment sold as a unit for playing a card and/or boar-type game | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |