USPTO serial 74246594
RADIANT SKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADIANT SKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nyack-on-Hudson, NY
Nyack-on-Hudson, NY
Nyack-on-Hudson, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE2800 ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products; namely, cleansing lotions, skin toner, skin moisturizers, night cream and fade cream | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |