USPTO serial 74246885
SANI-SORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANI-SORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. CHESTNUT
JOHN W CHESTNUT TILTON, FALLON, LUNGMUS & CHESTNUT100 S WACKER DR STE 960CHICAGO, IL 60606-4002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | super absorbent polymer beads with or without disinfectants used to solidify blood and body fluids on hard surfaces and in various collection vessels or devices such as suction canisters for medical and industrial use | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |