USPTO serial 74247250
ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 1996
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- EXECUTIVE ACCESS
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS BAGELS, INC.
Brooklyn, NY
ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS BAGELS, INC.
Brooklyn, NY
Arnie's Bagelicious Bagels, Inc.
Brooklyn, NY
BROWNSBURG, IN
Arnie's Bagelicious Bagels, Inc.
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy M. Klass
Jeremy M. Klass Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bagels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS BAGELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS BAGELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Arnie's Bagelicious Bagels, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPLEHURST BAGELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Arnie's Bagelicious Bagels, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ARNIE'S BAGELICIOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 15, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |