USPTO serial 74247278
SECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Welter
PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | central security services for monitoring remote premises for crime prevention, fire prevention, and disasters prevention; monitoring and dispatching services for security systems, emergency medical assistance, health care services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SECOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA (SECOM CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by SECOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA (SECOM CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECOM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |