USPTO serial 74247337
RHAPSODY ON ICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RHAPSODY ON ICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |