USPTO serial 74247363
PROTEX-ALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTER, SASHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTEX-ALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene E. Renz
EUGENE E RENZP O BOX 2056205 N MONROE STMEDIA, PA 19063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | security products used to prevent theft of store and warehouse merchandise; namely, brackets for use with various displays and fixtures; mounting units for electronic and video equipment; rails for use in hanging and displaying clothing on hangers; lanyards; locking units for use with various merchandise displays and for preventing theft of clothing, belts, handbags, and jewelry; rings, chains, lock boxes, and cable wire for use with lock boxes to prevent theft of soft goods; showcase locks; door locks; padlocks; latch and dead bolt locks; and cable clips; all made of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electronic security systems for use in retail stores, restaurants, banks and the work place; namely, sensors; intrusion detectors; wires and cables; security clips; visual and audible alarms; electronic lock boxes; merchandise tags; and plug-in cables | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1995 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |