USPTO serial 74247483
HEICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Marcus
JOSEPH R MARCUS WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 S LASALLE ST STE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting, development and management services in the field of medical diagnostic equipment and facilities; namely, arranging the sale or lease of medical diagnostic equipment, providing access to medical diagnostic equipment, servicing medical diagnostic equipment, providing facilities managing the operation of medical diagnostic equipment and, consulting services for development and operation of medical diagnostic facilities | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |