USPTO serial 74247609
CLEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 1995
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
CAMBRIDGE, MA
CAMBRIDGE, MA
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
Cambridge, MA
Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J. MORRIS III
WILLIAM J MORRIS III BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [enzymes which have been crystallized and chemically crosslinked for use as catalysts in applications in the industrial, scientific, pharmaceutical, food, beverage, medical, agricultural and petrochemical industries] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1994 |
| 005 | enzymes which have been crystallized and chemically crosslinked for use as a pharmaceutical substance in the treatment of genetic disorders and enzyme and protein deficiencies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1994 |
| 032 | [enzymes which have been crystallized and chemically crosslinked for use as a preparation for the making of soft drinks, beer, ale, mineral and aerated waters, fruit and vegetable juices and sports drinks] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1994 |
| 040 | manufacture and modification, to the order or specification of others, of enzymes which have been crystallized and chemically crosslinked | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1994 |
| 042 | development, design, and testing for others of enzymes which have been crystallized and chemically crosslinked | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by ALTUS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTUS BIOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |