USPTO serial 74247695
ESTATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill W. Bradbury
JILL W BRADBURY BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401 SCOTIA PLZ40 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |