USPTO serial 74248134
NETPROBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETPROBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon C. Christiansen
JON C CHRISTIANSEN VAN COTT, BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHYP O BOX 45340SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | network traffic monitor for use in connection with computer networks; and computer programs for network traffic monitoring | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |