USPTO serial 74248251
COOKING FOR TWO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 1992
- Examiner
- KELLY, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOKING FOR TWO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Kupersmith Larkin
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN BAKER & MCKENZIECITICORP PLZ THIRTY-SEVENTH FL777 S FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications; namely, magazine dealing with recipes, foods, desserts, menus, kitchen equipment, lifestyles, shopping, table settings, wines and liquors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |