Drawing for EPIGEL

USPTO serial 74248678

EPIGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010synthetic corneal in-laysABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 3, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 2, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 12, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 31, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 3, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 1, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 1, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 5, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance