Drawing for SEA HARVEST

USPTO serial 74248717

SEA HARVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGELL, CHARLES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA HARVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERTREPUBLIC BLDG FIRST FL1018 PRESTON ST STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fresh seafood, fresh frozen seafood, and frozen seafoodABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 20, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance