USPTO serial 74248909
THE EXTRA CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE EXTRA CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M4V 2J8, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded lockable video cassettes tapes featuring movies; and machines for unlocking lockable video cassettes and for reading data from video cassettes | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | marketing information services; namely, supplying video cassette tape rental transaction data such as the total number of times a particular program was rented in a particular period and the number of times a particular program was rented from a particular outlet in a given period | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |