USPTO serial 74249209
EF EURO FUNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EF EURO FUNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
COSTA MESA, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and boys' tops, shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, jackets, vests, sweatpants, pants, shorts, swimwear, headwear and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |