USPTO serial 74249318
ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M. NEWMAN
MARK M NEWMAN (BARNES & THORNBURG)1401 EYE ST N WSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of organizing, scheduling and conducting football games | ABANDONED | Apr 27, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |