Drawing for ARENA FOOTBALL

USPTO serial 74249469

ARENA FOOTBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARENA FOOTBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK M. NEWMAN

MARK M NEWMAN (BARNES & THORNBURG)1041 EYE ST N WSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services in the nature of organizing, scheduling and conducting football gamesABANDONEDApr 27, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 11, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 23, 1995REINREINSTATED—
Jun 7, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance