USPTO serial 74249614
MAXVUE CAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2950730Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXVUE CAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
Cynthia Clarke Weber Sughrue Mion, PLLC.Suite 8002100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20037-3213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive image generator, database tools, video displays and projectors; computer programs for generating graphics displays; computers and computer programs for operating training and research simulators for aircraft, land vehicles and marine vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |