Drawing for BEVERLY HILLS 90210

USPTO serial 74249666

BEVERLY HILLS 90210

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEVERLY HILLS 90210?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Virzi

MICHELLE VIRZI WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK, ET AL633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030candy and breakfast cerealsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 1996EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 17, 1995REINREINSTATED—
Jun 23, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 10, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 28, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 24, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 1994DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 2, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 2, 1993DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 1992DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 21, 1992DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 7, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance