Drawing for PERFECT MATCH

USPTO serial 74249945

PERFECT MATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT MATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Annette P. Heller

ANNETTE P HELLER HELLER AND KEPLER721 EMERSON, STE 569ST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042dating servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 19, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 6, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance