USPTO serial 74250015
BIOCHEM VACCINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOCHEM VACCINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vaccines and immunological preparations for human use to prevent diphtheria, tetanus, influenza, pertussis, rubella, hepatitis b, haemophilus influenzae b, measles, tuberculosis; vaccines and immunological preparations for animal use to prevent brucellosis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |