USPTO serial 74250398
AAVS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AAVS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmond T. Patnaude
EDMOND T PATNAUDETER EXECUTIVE CTR COURT C1 S 376 SUMMIT AVEOAK BROOK TERRACE, IL 60181Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | wholesale distributorship services in the field of electronic equipment, signal combiners and processors for television systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |