USPTO serial 74250406
RADAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 1995
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RADAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
VANCOUVER BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce M. Green
Bruce M. Green Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP480 - 601 West Cordova StreetVancouver, BC, V6B1G1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital audio recorders and accessories therefor; namely, multi-effects processors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Creation Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creation Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creation Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IZ TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RADAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 21, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 20, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |