USPTO serial 74251072
LA VITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA VITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL MARZULLO & ARONSON, PCONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, liquids and powders for normal, dry and oily skin; body powder; anti-wrinkle antiaging cream, lotion and gel; hydrating day face cream, lotion and gel; hydrating night cream, lotion and gel; facial hydrating mask and placenta extract; skin toning cream, lotion and gel; firming bust cream, lotion and gel; pimple, acne and corrective cream, lotion and gel; eye make-up; whitening toothpaste and tooth gel; bath gelee, suntan lotion, lipstick, nail polish, perfume, cologne, after shave, aloe cream, lotion and gel; cellular cream, lotion and gel; cellular cream, lotion and gel; and collagen, home- and auto-care products; namely, laundry detergent, prewash spray, prewash stick, fabric softener, bleach, furniture polish, household liquid ceaner, dish-washing detergent, metal cleaner, auto polish, bug and tar remover | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | vitamin supplements; fish oil; dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; dietary food supplements; medicinal teas; medicated hair care preparations; petroleum jelly for medical purposes; bee pollen for use as a dietary for supplement; herbal tea for medicinal purposes; protein for supplement | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | water filters | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | accessories; namely, handbags, totebags, briefcases, luggage | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing; namely, shoes, boots, slippers, stockings, hosiery, socks; lingerie, underwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LA VITA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LA VITA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |