USPTO serial 74251774
EARTHWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2168735Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 1998
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EARTHWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Johannesburg, Transvaal, ZA
Johannesburg, Transvaal, ZA
Johannesburg, Transvaal, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW N FREDBECK
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable protein-based foods consisting primarily of vegetables, fruits, soy, nuts, cereal, grains, malt and/or skim milk, namely, burger patties, fruit-based and vegetable-based pie fillings, fruit-based and vegetable-based snack bars; edible oils, edible fats and vegetable-based spreads; fruit sauces; jellies; and jams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | preparations made [ form ] * from * cereals and grains, namely, breakfast cereals, breads and pastry; processed and unprocessed snack grains, malt derived from and combined with processed fruit, vegetables, soya, nuts and skimmed milk, vegetable sauce; food flavorings being nonessential oils; spices and sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saretzky, Eric Ivor
- Other trademarks owned by Saretzky, Eric Ivor
- Other trademarks owned by Saretzky, Eric Ivor
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EARTHWISE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |