USPTO serial 74251922
KOALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KOALA SPRINGS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Moorabbin, Victoria 3189, AU
KOALA SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL INC.
FREMONT, CA
KOALA SPRINGS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Moorabbin, Victoria 3189, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth G. Gentry
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER755 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | tea, ice cream, cereal based food bars with fruit, fruit ice and fruit pies, cakes, tarts and pastries | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOALA SPRINGS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by KOALA SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KOALA SPRINGS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KOALA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |