USPTO serial 74252351
SIMPLY SLIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLY SLIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W BECKER5300 SEQUOIA NW STE 200ALBUQUERQUE, MN 87120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement, nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1994 |
| 029 | yogurt and/or fruit coated nuts | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1994 |
| 030 | fruit flavored grain based snack bars, candied fruit snacks, nut flavored grain based snack bars, chocolate covered nuts, candied nuts, grain based fiber food beverages, cookies | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNDERLEIDER, ANDREW
- Other trademarks owned by NATURAL NECTAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NATURAL NECTAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SIMPLY SLIM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |