USPTO serial 74252413
CRYSTAL CLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 1993
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYSTAL CLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
7943 PE MEPPEL, NL
8937 AC LEEUWARDEN, NL
FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
8937 AC Leeuwarden, NL
Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
8937 AC Leeuwarden, NL
Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | spring water | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND BRANDS BV
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND BRANDS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLAND (Frico Domo) Cooperatie B.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CRYSTAL CLEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | โ |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| May 7, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | โ |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Dec 13, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 13, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | โ |
| Jul 17, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Sep 28, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |