USPTO serial 74252667
QUANTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUANTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Cinnaminson, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Lynn Perry
E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND KHOURIE AND CREW20TH FL STEUART ST TWRONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | environmental diagnostic testing services for determining the presence of contaminants or disease; agricultural, crop and food diagnostic testing for determining the presence of contaminants or disease | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Agri-Diagnostics Associates
- Other trademarks owned by AGRI-DIAGNOSTICS ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTIX SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by AGRI-DIAGNOSTICS ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by Agri-Diagnostics Associates
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTIX SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTIX SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by QUANTIX SYSTEMS, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUANTIX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |