Drawing for FLEX BRIGHT

USPTO serial 74253595

FLEX BRIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEX BRIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Evans

JOHN C EVANS REISING, ETHINGTON, BARNARD ET ALPOST OFFICE BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012vehicle trim parts; namely, radiator grilles, exterior moldings, sight shields, wheel covers, cast aluminum wheels, interior and exterior door handles, appliques, bezels and housingsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 13, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance