USPTO serial 74253941
NEW YEAR'S EVE BALL DROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW YEAR'S EVE BALL DROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOUF, LAMB, LEIBY & MACRAE125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of musical groups, drama, news, light shows, variety entertainment, fireworks displays, and confetti dropping | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |