USPTO serial 74253975
EMAGOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMAGOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EUROPEAN GOLD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
92200 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
Other trademarks owned by EUROPEAN GOLD MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schwartz
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER1800 DIAGONAL RD STE 500P O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0299Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand operated tools in precious metals; namely, scissors and non-electric razors; cutlery and size arms; namely, table knives; razors | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | gold sold in bar, rod, sheet or billet form; jewelry; clocks and watches; gold cigarette lighters | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | association services; namely, promoting the interests of gold merchants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |