USPTO serial 74254358
EVERY FLAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERY FLAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. Schwab
BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated baby oil, baby shampoo, bath oil, body cream, body oil, hair conditioners, hand cream, night cream, skin cream, bath gel, hair gel, shower gel, hair cleaning preparations, hair conditioners, hair dressings for men, hair rinses, hair spray, hair styling preparations, massage oil, skin moisturizer, baby powder, talcum powder, hair shampoo, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin emollients, and skin lotion | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | medicated bath salts, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of dry skin, dandruff, and seborrhea, dandruff shampoo, and medicated shampoo | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EVERY FLAKE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |