USPTO serial 74254371
EVERY BLEMISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERY BLEMISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | shaving balm, cosmetics compacts, night cream, shaving cream, skin cleansing cream, face powder, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, shaving gel, makeup, facial makeup, body powder, rouge, hair shampoo, shaving lotion, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing lotion, and skin toners | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | acne medications, acne treatment preparations, antibiotic cream, hydrocortisone cream, medicated hair care preparations, medicated skin lotions, medicated body lotions, medicated pre-moistened tissues, medicated pre-moistened towelettes, medicated pre-moistened wipes, medicated shampoo, and topical gel for medical and therapeutic use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EVERY BLEMISH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |