USPTO serial 74254856
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
San Monica, CA
San Monica, CA
EL SEGUNDO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino, David J. Kappos, Margaret A. Pepper, Gina M. Lyons
ALEXANDER TOGNINO DAVID J KAPPOS MARG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | development enablement software providing computer programs for professional computer software development personnel who create application software, namely software that provides relational access to and monitoring of static real-time data to other computer software, but excluding software which enables the development of banking, financial and insurance applications for distributed systems and workstations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |