USPTO serial 74255449
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cellular telephone recording devices | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |