USPTO serial 74255629
RAINFOREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINFOREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK S HOSTETLER
MARK S HOSTETLER HERZOG CREBS & MCGHEE LLP1 CITY CTR 24TH FL515 N 6TH STST LOUIS, MO 63101-2409Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | popcorn-based confections; cookies; nut brittle | ABANDONED | Oct 21, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINFOREST COMPANY, L.L.C., THE
- Other trademarks owned by Community Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Community Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named RAINFOREST
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |