USPTO serial 74255958
MAXMATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXMATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Isle of Man, GB
Isle of Man, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence R. Brown
LAURENCE R BROWN LARUENCE BROWN & ASSOCIATES PC2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 408ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sporting goods; namely, elastic screens for returning thrown balls; tennis, badminton, and volleyball nets and posts; tennis rackets; baseball and cricket bats; golf clubs; soccerballs, baseballs, footballs, tennis balls, golf balls, volleyballs, and basketballs; baseball gloves; hitting tees for baseball and golf, field markers, and targets; goals for soccer and hockey | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |