USPTO serial 74256009
INTELLIGENT MODULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT MODULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Brunton
JAMES E BRUNTON700 N BRAND BLVD STE 1190GLENDALE, CA 91203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | non-computerized medical apparatus; namely, fluid delivery dispensers for infusion of medicinals into patients | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |