USPTO serial 74256427
LUXOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUXOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Quirk
EDWARD J QUIRK QUIRK, TRATOS & ROETHEL550 E CHARLESTON BLVD STE DLAS VEGAS, NV 89104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, hats and jackets | ABANDONED | May 11, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |