USPTO serial 74256435
SECOND CUP COFFEE CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECOND CUP COFFEE CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, M8X 2X3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Albert Drobile
1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric coffee makers for domestic use | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed publications; namely, circulars, newsletters, and newspapers in the field of coffee and tea, particularly, the origins, cultivation, preparation, and flavor profiles of coffee and tea | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | non-electric coffee and tea pots, not of precious metals | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, prepackaged spices; namely, muffins, cookies and pastries | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | business management consulting services specializing in advising and assisting others in the operation of retail stores | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail store services specializing in the sale of coffee, tea and cocoa for consumption on or off the premises and in bulk, bakery goods, and accessories for use in the preparation and brewing of beverages; namely, coffee and tea pots, coffee brewing equipment, mugs, cups and saucers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SECOND CUP LTD., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECOND CUP COFFEE CO.
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |