USPTO serial 74256460
SEMICARB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1858087Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 1994
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEMICARB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gardena, CA
Gardena, CA
GARDENA, CA
CLEVELAND, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH G. CURATOLO
JOSEPH G CURATOLO RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, ET AL24500 CTR RIDGE RD STE 280WESTLAKE, OH 44145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | silicon [ carbons ] * CARBON * for use in [ semiconductors ] * SEMICONDUCTOR * wafer production in the electronics industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 25, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BP Chemicals (Hitco) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BP Chemicals (Hitco) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HITCO CARBON COMPOSITES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BP Chemicals (Hitco) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SEMICARB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 24, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 19, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |